Let's dive into a fascinating tale of Hollywood's past, where we uncover the contrasting experiences of two iconic actors on a single film set.
The Movie That Divided Them
In the late 1950s, Alan Hale Jr., who would later become known as the beloved Captain Jonas Grumby on "Gilligan's Island," was already making waves in the industry. His journey included starring in his own Western series and collaborating with renowned actors like Audie Murphy and Kirk Douglas. One of his projects during this period was the World War II submarine drama "Up Periscope," where he shared the screen with James Garner, an actor who, unbeknownst to Hale, held a very different opinion of the film.
A Tale of Two Perspectives
"Up Periscope," directed by Gordon Douglas, was an adaptation of Robb White's novel. It starred Garner as a Navy frogman, Lt. Kenneth Braden, who is thrust into a dangerous mission to obtain a Japanese code book. Hale played Pat Malone, a fellow officer, but his role was relatively minor. However, the film's reception and Garner's contempt for it became a significant part of its legacy.
Garner, in his memoir "The Garner Files: A Memoir," co-written with Jon Winokur, gave "Up Periscope" a scathing one-star review, calling it "another piece of crap" he was forced to make while under contract. This sentiment was echoed by A. H. Weiler of the New York Times, who described the film as "somewhat undramatic." Yet, Weiler also acknowledged the film's strengths, praising the cast and director for their "accomplishment of their missions," and specifically mentioning Hale Jr.'s ability to bring levity to the proceedings.
The Impact and Implications
What makes this story particularly fascinating is the contrast it reveals. While Hale Jr. seemed to enjoy his time on the set and the opportunity to work with Garner, the latter's disdain for the film is a stark reminder of the subjective nature of art. It raises the question: Can a film be considered a failure if one of its stars hates it, despite critical acclaim or audience enjoyment?
From my perspective, this story highlights the complex relationship between artists and their work. It's a reminder that even when a project doesn't align with an actor's vision or preferences, their professional commitment often shines through. In this case, Hale Jr.'s performance, albeit small, was still appreciated and recognized.
A Deeper Look
This incident also sheds light on the power dynamics within the industry. Garner, a contracted actor, had little choice but to participate in projects he disliked. It's a reminder of the challenges actors face, especially when they are bound by contractual obligations. On the other hand, Hale Jr., who seemed to embrace the opportunity, perhaps had more freedom in his career choices at that time.
In conclusion, the contrasting experiences of Hale Jr. and Garner on "Up Periscope" offer a unique insight into the Hollywood machine. It's a story that showcases the personal journeys and perspectives of artists, often hidden behind the glitz and glamour of the silver screen. It's a reminder that behind every movie, there are individual stories and experiences that shape the final product.
